Fifth Generation Air Combat

Maintaining the Joint Force Advantage

By General

By Gen

 Jeffrey L.

 Harrigian

, US

 AF

Director, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (2019-2022)

By Colonel

By Col

 Max M.

 Marosko III

, US

 AF

Deputy Director Air and Cyberspace Operations, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces

Published:
 July 2017
 in 

This is an abridged version of an article published in the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies Journal Ed. No. 6, July 2016.

Fifth Generation Aircraft, Defined

For the purposes of this paper, we must define what a ‘fifth generation’ aircraft means in the context of modern military operations. A fifth generation aircraft is capable of operating effectively in highly contested combat environments, defined by the presence of the most capable current air and ground threats, and those reasonably expected to be operational in the foreseeable future. Currently fielded fifth generation aircraft include the Air Force’s F-22A Raptor and the US Marine Corps F-35B Lightning II, with the USAF F-35A targeted to achieve initial operational capability later this year.

There are many characteristics of fifth generation aircraft that separate them from older aircraft. These include, primarily, multi-spectral low observable (LO) design features (such as radar, infrared sensors, and visual situational awareness tools), along with self-protection and radar jamming capabilities that delay or deny enemy systems the ability to detect, track, and engage the aircraft. These aircraft also feature integrated avionics, which autonomously fuse and prioritize the aircraft’s multi-spectral sensors and off board data, providing an accurate real-time operations picture for the pilot, and the ability to download data for post-mission analysis. This is a present-day example of ‘man-machine teaming’. Advanced on-board diagnostics help vital monitoring of the aircraft’s health, accurately reporting faults as they occur, increasing overall system performance and reliability.

Resilient communications, navigation, and identification tools and techniques are also crucial aspects of fifth generation aircraft, designed to counter enemy attempts to jam, deny, or confuse these vital capabilities. Fifth generation aircraft are also empowered by robust networks, linking individual aircraft to create a common, accurate, and highly integrated picture of the battle space for friendly forces. The aircraft and its subsystem designs are also closely integrated, far more intricately than older aircraft. This helps to maximize lethality and survivability while enabling decision-making superiority by reducing the number of actions required by the pilot. The effect of these tools in total turns operators of these advanced aircraft into mission commanders, rather than having them focus on managing and operating subsystems (like in older third and fourth generation ‘legacy’ aircraft). Despite their capability, at present fifth generation aircraft comprise a fraction of the current combat air forces. The average age of a current USAF airframe is 27 years, and rising.1 Modernizing fighter and bomber forces with sufficient numbers of fifth generation aircraft is critical for continued combat relevance, especially in light of three important trends:

  • Modern Integrated Air Defence Systems (IADS) have created regions where fourth generation aircraft cannot effectively penetrate and hope to survive.2
  • Threat aircraft, air-to-air missiles (AAMs), electronic attack (EA), and electronic protection systems have advanced beyond the capabilities of US fourth generation fighters.3
  • Fifth generation aircraft provide a wider variety of wartime options in many scenarios, preserve US technological advantage over near-peer threats, and serve as force multipliers by increasing the situational awareness and combat effectiveness of legacy aircraft.

Understanding Fifth Generation Operations

An effective capability, such as fifth generation aircraft, is only a tool and must be properly utilized with effective preparation to perform at its best and empower joint operations fully. To achieve success with any fifth generation aircraft requires all personnel associated with the generation and employment of these capabilities, to include aircrew, maintenance, and support personnel, to optimize their roles in ensuring effective combat operations.

Airmen must have an intuitive understanding of their aircraft and how it performs in relationship to the threats it might encounter.4 They must train for the most demanding scenarios against the latest IADS and enemy aircraft, and US military services, allies, and partner nations must also develop a strategy with fiscally realistic and executable plans to adequately train against advanced adversary advanced capabilities (including air-to-air, surface to air, space, and cyber threats). These plans and preparations must include an appropriate mix of live, virtual, and constructive (LVC) training scenarios and exercises. This is of added importance in the context of fifth generation aircraft, as flight simulator training is even more important than with older aircraft. To a greater extent than training with legacy aircraft, fifth generation simulators must provide realistic training through timely concurrency with the aircraft, sufficient fidelity for realism, and appropriate connectivity to other assets for realistic exercising. In addition to operators, maintenance personnel require more training to adequately keep up fifth generation aircraft and their vital low radar signatures.

To improve survivability against adversary IADS, the signatures of fifth generation aircraft must be actively managed, much like airframe inspection and engine maintenance schedules.5 Commanders must ensure that training resources are adequately provided for these assets to capitalize on the unique capabilities they bring to the operational environment. All personnel must be trained to understand the importance of specialized security requirements for fifth generation aircraft. From ensuring physical security and cyber standards to balancing protection of classified capabilities with realistic training, personnel must appreciate and carry out security guidelines for daily operations effectively, as well as those for allied, coalition, and partner training exercises and combat operations. Lastly, commanders and support personnel must understand the fifth generation aircraft global sustainment system, for both home station and during deployed operations. Commanders should consider and actively track changing threat conditions, and how these can impact the ability to sustain their fifth generation operations.

Fifth Generation Airpower and Data

Fifth generation aircraft bring incredible capability into combat. But they are also some of the most data-dependent machines in the US inventory, and require significant amounts of information in order to operate at their best.

Fifth generation aircrew and aircraft rely on mission data files to enable on-board systems to accurately identify friendly, neutral, and adversary systems. This data allows fifth generation pilots to enhance their stealth, or low observable (LO) signature management, enabling the aircraft to survive and maintain situational awareness of events in combat even when operating in close proximity to advanced threats. The US Air Force, sister services, allies, and the intelligence community have an essential role in populating and updating these files. Not only is this mission data necessary for internal operation of these aircraft, this data also contains the capability for fifth generation systems to communicate their fused sensor products off board to other aircraft, providing an integrated common operating picture of a conflict or contingency. In the future, near-real time exploitation of fifth generation aircraft’s unique information collection capabilities will become increasingly mandatory to operate in more sophisticated threat environments.

To achieve true combat systems integration, this fused sensor information must be linked up with USAF’s much larger legacy aircraft forces and select command and control nodes via data links and cloud-based communication architectures. By linking this information to the entire force, an actionable common operating and targeting picture can be created for commanders and decision makers. As sensors, communication protocols, and data links improve, all friendly forces should be able to share the multi-domain situational awareness fifth generation aircraft can generate, in cooperation with other assets. To perform this effectively, though, requires a detailed systems understanding of data link architectures, and protocols to ensure communication compatibility across the enterprise.

Deploying and Sustaining Fifth Generation Airpower

Squadrons of fifth generation aircraft deploy today extensively, much like fourth generation units that preceded them (aircraft such as F-16s, F-15s, and others). But to realize the potential of fifth generation aircraft in modern joint operations, fifth generation communities in the USAF must make several improvements.

First, units must improve deployment reaction time and speed, as windows of opportunity to penetrate IADS or to destroy high value targets may be fleeting. Second, fifth generation aircraft units must work diligently to minimize the required amount of forward-deployed equipment and personnel, and fully understand the logistics, sustainment, and communications limitations at a deployed location. Third, the Air Force must work to increase flexible basing options available for fifth generation aircraft (such as increasing the number of airfields the Air Force can deploy to), and build a fuller understanding of the impact these options will have on operations, maintenance, and command and control in dispersed locations.

This includes not only conducting combat operations from bases owned by our international partners, but also operating at relatively austere locations. Deploying and operating from limited support locations does come with some challenges. The US and its allies must ensure support (logistics and connectivity) can be delivered to forward airfields where commercial carriers may not operate. Finally, fifth generation aircraft sustainment and support systems must be hardened with sufficient redundancy to ensure resilience under attack. This hardening must be multi-domain, and the sustainment and support systems must be able to survive and operate in the face of both kinetic and cyber attack.

Successful Employment and Sustainment Across the Spectrum

Combat employment of air assets may occur across a wide spectrum of potential conflicts, from permissive environments, where legacy and fifth generation aircraft can operate together with ease, to highly contested environments, where only fifth generation aircraft can operate effectively. In permissive or moderately contested environments, the force packaging of airpower can combine both legacy and fifth generation aircraft to maximize survivability, and the lethality of the force. Since legacy aircraft sensors alone may be insufficient to detect threats, or may be overwhelmed by the quantity of threats, fifth generation aircraft may provide the most utility by sharing their fused operations picture via a well-constructed data link feeding this information into the communications architecture, which disperses this picture to as many legacy aircraft as possible.

Likewise, legacy aircraft increase a force’s ordnance capacity due to the limited internal carriage configurations of fifth generation aircraft. Modern fifth generation aircraft can offer targeting solutions for fourth generation assets via established data links, while themselves targeting threats only by exception. This gives commanders an incredible amount of operational flexibility. In highly contested environments, an air component commander might use only fifth generation aircraft to bypass an IADS and neutralize the objective. Alternatively, fifth generation aircraft can destroy or degrade enemy defences to create a temporary or localized permissive (or semi-permissive) environment where legacy aircraft can operate with relative freedom of action. This often requires fifth generation aircraft to operate on the leading edge of the force package, allowing legacy aircraft to ingress and destroy priority targets.

Once combat begins, however, adversaries may adjust tactics, as well as the operating parameters of their systems. Thus, leaders will need to ensure that appropriate intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) assets report this information quickly to the mission data enterprise supporting fifth generation aircraft and other elements of joint force operations. There must be a robust processing exploitation dissemination (PED)-like process for analysing the data fifth generation aircraft collect. Commanders need to proactively ensure operations data is linked properly with the intelligence enterprise. This linkage will allow for the proper analysis of information, and more importantly, the proper application of learned information. This kind of seamless information sharing must be achieved to enable rapid reprogramming and re-release of mission data files for optimum employment of all allied assets.

In order to make this employment concept a reality, collaboration is critical. USAF units must be able to share lessons with other US military services and, as required, select allied and coalition partners. Sharing with international partners while balancing security concerns will be paramount to successful future fifth generation aircraft employment. Joint and combined training, exercises, and even ‘cross talks’ at forums like tactics conferences and training review boards will also be critical learning and development opportunities. In addition, it is necessary to ensure fifth generation pilots, as well as maintenance and logistics personnel, fill key billets on major command, headquarters, and joint staff positions to inform senior leaders, and enable appropriate enterprise-wide resource planning and decision making.

Maintenance of fifth generation aircraft also requires careful planning to keep the force ready for combat operations. While fifth generation aircraft require the same maintenance considerations as legacy aircraft, such as maintaining flight systems and engines, there are additional requirements to maintain their low observable (LO) characteristics. This adds another level of complexity USAF leadership must proactively manage. The Air Force must understand how the logistics enterprise can support the unique capabilities of fifth generation aircraft both in garrison and during deployed operations. While deployed, leaders and commanders must understand how to leverage in-theatre fifth generation assets, along with sister US military service or partner nation logistics networks. When the answers to these sustainment challenges are discovered, they should be analysed rapidly with respect to the changing phases of a given campaign, training exercise, or other engagement involving fifth generation aircraft.

Conclusion: Employing Our Advantage for Joint and Combined Force Operations

Employing these aircraft in future combat requires careful attention across several phases and aspects of employment beyond the aircraft themselves. These aspects include advanced planning, preparation, ensuring effective use and dissemination of mission data, how deployment of fifth generation aircraft is conducted, actual combat employment design, and supporting operations with appropriate logistics and sustainment practices.

While fifth generation aircraft do not provide decision makers with a single-point solution, their demonstrated ability as valued contributors to strategic deterrence, capacity as advanced airborne echelons, and operational utility as enduring force multipliers make them indispensable to future joint force operations.

In addition to the elements of fifth generation airpower described in this paper, future concepts of employment should aim to focus on several integration priorities. These areas include refining connectivity between legacy and fifth generation aircraft, improving connections between fifth generation airborne platforms, improving integration with space and cyber capabilities, and integrating fifth generation platforms with other components of joint and combined force operations. Integration advances in these areas will aid progress towards the goal of creating a cloud-based architecture where every element of air, space, and cyber power contribute to conducting disaggregated, distributed operations over a wide area. The complementary employment of capabilities from all domains will enhance the effectiveness of future combat operations, and help compensate for vulnerabilities.

The need to explore these concepts will only increase. In the coming decade, fifth generation aircraft will grow and mature in sufficient numbers to give the US and our allies a definitive strategic advantage to counter the advancement of modern weapon systems used by potential adversaries. These potential adversary weapon systems, from aircraft to cruise missiles to advanced SAMs and cyber capabilities, are currently contributing factors to the destabilization of contested regions around the world. Fifth generation aircraft are critical to returning the military balance to our favor. Along with thoughtful integration and investment in select legacy aircraft, the maturation of fifth generation aircraft capabilities in sufficient numbers will better enable joint force operations that will provide the US and its allies a wider range of options to secure our interests in a scenario which could emerge in the coming years.

Secretary James and Gen Welsh, ‘Fiscal Year 2015 Air Force Posture Statement’, p. 6.
Surface to Air Missile (SAM) capability available for export from countries like Russia and China has steadily increased in recent years. Relatively inexpensive SAMs increasingly provide an improved barrier for nations seeking defences against air attack, especially against older aircraft. Maximum ranges and targeting capability for these SAMs have immensely improved, and many are often mobile, presenting a challenging targeting set for fourth generation systems. While these SAMs remain a formidable threat, fifth generation systems have a greater capacity to overcome and operate in environments defended by these weapons.
The US DOD has not heavily invested, compared to our adversaries, in electronic attack (EA) capabilities for our fighters. Over the years, we have continued to rely upon the X band in the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum for our targeting and engagement capability and therefore, continue to play ‘catch up’ in countering their advancements in EA capabilities. This history, combined with advancements in air-to-air missiles and adversary employment ranges, increases the risk to our legacy assets. The characteristics of fifth generation aircraft mitigate that risk.
Fifth generation aircrew must understand their aircraft’s signature and its expected detectability against threats. While pilots can expect their aircraft will be within the expected signature specification at the start of a mission, degradation can occur. All aircrew must know when they should and should not expect to be detected, to enable necessary adjustments for a given mission.
Maintaining fifth generation aircraft signatures is similar to managing the hours until the next inspection or engine maintenance schedules of legacy aircraft. The signature of an entire squadron of fifth generation aircraft must be tracked and managed very closely. If not managed, the man-hour bill required to bring a squadron of aircraft back to specification can quickly become unmanageable, impacting aircraft availability and training.
Content Navigation
Author
General
 Jeffrey L.
 Harrigian
Director, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (2019-2022)

General Jeffrey L. Harrigian is the Commander of the Allied Air Command, Commander of the US Air Forces in Europe, Commander of the US Air Forces Africa, and Director of the Joint Air Power Competence Centre. He is responsible for Air Force activities in an area covering more than 19 million square miles. As Commander of the Allied Air Command, General Harrigian is responsible to the Supreme Allied Commander Europe for the Air and Missile Defence of NATO Alliance member nations during peacetime operations. Furthermore, in the event of a joint NATO operation, he is the responsible commander of the Air Component.

General Harrigian is a graduate of the US Air Force Academy. He has served in a variety of assignments, including Commander of the US Air Forces Central Command, Combined Force Air Component Commander, US Central Command; Deputy Director for Strategy, Plans and Assessments, US Forces-Iraq; and Chief of the Joint Exercise Division at NATO’s Joint Warfare Centre, Stavanger, Norway. He has flown combat missions in support of operations Just Cause, Desert Storm and Inherent Resolve.

General Harrigian is a command pilot with more than 4,100 hours in the F-22, F-15C, A/OA-37 and MQ-1 aircraft.

Information provided is current as of January 2021
Author
Colonel
 Max M.
 Marosko III
Deputy Director Air and Cyberspace Operations, Headquarters Pacific Air Forces

Colonel Max M. Marosko III is a United States Air Force F-22 Raptor pilot, currently serving as the deputy director for air and cyberspace operations at Headquarters Pacific Air Forces, JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii. Marosko served multiple combat tours in the F-15C prior to transitioning to the F-22. In addition to serving as an Air Force Weapons School instructor in both the F-15C and the F-22, Marosko has commanded an F-22 squadron, and previously served as the 325th Operations Group commander at Tyndall AFB, Fla. prior to his current assignment. At the 325th OG, he oversaw the operations of both an operational F-22 squadron and the Air Force’s only F-22 training squadron. He also served in the initial training cadre for USAF’s F-22 Formal Training Unit (FTU), and is a graduate of the National War College at Fort McNair, Washington, DC.

Information provided is current as of July 2017

Other Articles in this Journal

Leadership Perspective

Royal Danish Air Force – Next Generation

Interview with Major General Max A. L. T. Nielsen, Chief of Air Staff, Defence Command Denmark

Transformation & Capabilities

Hypersonic Vehicles

Game Changers for Future Warfare?

Future Battlefield Rotorcraft Capability

Operating in the Land and Littoral Environment Anno 2035 - Part 1: Analysing the Future Operating Environment

Preserving NATO’s C2 Edge

Capitalizing on MTDS/LVC Advanced Capabilities

Better Together

First Ever Air-to-Air Refuelling Clearance Request/Approval Training and Table Top Exercise

European Security and the Significance of the F-35

Viewpoints

JAPCC Perspective on the Fifth Generation Aircraft Discussion

Air Warfare Communication in a Networked Environment

Beating Brownout

Technology Helps, but Training Remains Key

Enabling Maritime ISR through the ‘Family of Systems’

Out of the Box

The Rise of Close Air Support after World War II

Did the US Army and US Air Force Inter-Service Rivalry Benefit Close Air Support?

No Fair Fights

The Effects of Hybrid War, Disinformation, and RPA Automation on NATO Air Power

The Competence Centre for Surface Based Air and Missile Defence

Preserving the EADTF Legacy and Furthering the IAMD Mission

Contact Us

Contact Information

Joint Air Power Competence Centre
Römerstrasse 140
47546 Kalkar
Germany

+49 (0) 2824 90 2201

Download Request for Support

Please leave us a message